FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE
FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) and CEBG.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) are both China Equities funds - FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped while CEBG.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXC.DE returned -3.95%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for CEBG.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEBG.DE.
Performance
FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXC.DE achieves a -5.94% return, which is significantly lower than CEBG.DE's 11.81% return.
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 16.61%
- 1Y
- 32.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 16.83% | 19.48% |
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 11.81% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | 5.85% | 26.86% | -10.03% | 8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXC.DE and CEBG.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXC.DE
CEBG.DE
FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXC.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.29 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 2.78 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 11.03 | -10.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXC.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.63 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.65 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.24 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXC.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, roughly equal to the maximum CEBG.DE drawdown of -53.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXC.DE and CEBG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXC.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -53.49% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -11.78% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.70% | -30.41% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.07% | -30.41% | -18.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.89% | -4.44% | -26.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -15.04% | -12.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 2.98% | +4.40% |
Volatility
FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) is 6.78%, while VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that FLXC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXC.DE | CEBG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 7.80% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 16.73% | -4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 20.05% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 21.13% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 24.18% | +2.02% |
FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CEBG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXC.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXC.DE nor CEBG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXC.DE and CEBG.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEBG.DE.
FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped, while CEBG.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXC.DE and 0.60% for CEBG.DE.
Find the right allocation for FLXC.DE and CEBG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer