FLV vs. MFVL
FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
FLV vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.
FLV
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLV vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 5.79% | 1.27% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLV and MFVL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLV vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
FLV
MFVL
FLV vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.31 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
FLV vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -7.03% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -3.29% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -2.42% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | — | — |
Volatility
FLV vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 12.15% | -2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 12.15% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 12.15% | +2.10% |
FLV vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLV vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLV and MFVL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
FLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for FLV and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for FLV and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer