FLV vs. DIA
FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - FLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. FLV is actively managed, while DIA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLV returned 10.28%/yr vs 10.36%/yr for DIA. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FLV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DIA.
Performance
FLV vs. DIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 9.95% return.
FLV
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.67%
DIA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 22.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.05B | $1.95B | $2.38B | |
| $484.68K | $489.80K | $1.09M |
FLV vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 14.23% | 15.80% | 11.51% | 6.23% | 0.94% | 17.30% | 43.00% |
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 9.95% | 14.71% | 14.82% | 16.02% | -7.02% | 20.83% | 48.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLV and DIA is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FLV and DIA shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLV vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLV
DIA
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
FLV
DIA
Healthcare
FLV
DIA
Consumer Defensive
FLV
DIA
Industrials
FLV
DIA
Technology
FLV
DIA
Energy
FLV
DIA
Consumer Cyclical
FLV
DIA
Utilities
FLV
DIA
-
Basic Materials
FLV
DIA
Real Estate
FLV
DIA
-
Communication Services
FLV
DIA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLV vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank
FLV
DIA
FLV vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.12 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 8.21 | +1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLV vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and DIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -51.87% | +36.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -9.76% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | -15.95% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | -20.76% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -1.06% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -7.11% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 2.52% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FLV vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.74% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 9.82% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 12.52% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 14.83% | -2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 17.53% | -3.30% |
FLV vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLV vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison
FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than DIA's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.37% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.51% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLV and DIA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLV has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to DIA (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLV dropped -15.06% vs DIA's -51.87%.
On 5-year performance, DIA leads with 10.36% vs 10.28% for FLV. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIA has performed better with a 10.36% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for FLV.
FLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.37% for DIA.
FLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for FLV and 0.16% for DIA.
FLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLV and DIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer