FLV vs. HDV
FLV (American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. FLV is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLV returned 8.47%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for HDV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
FLV vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.69% return.
FLV
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 5.79%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
FLV vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 5.79% | 15.80% | 11.51% | 6.23% | 0.94% | 17.30% | 39.27% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | 25.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLV and HDV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FLV and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLV vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLV
HDV
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FLV
HDV
Healthcare
FLV
HDV
Consumer Defensive
FLV
HDV
Industrials
FLV
HDV
Technology
FLV
HDV
Energy
FLV
HDV
Utilities
FLV
HDV
Communication Services
FLV
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
FLV
HDV
Basic Materials
FLV
HDV
Real Estate
FLV
HDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLV vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
FLV
HDV
FLV vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.95 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 11.02 | -3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.10 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.81 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.72 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
FLV vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -37.04% | +21.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -5.18% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | -10.49% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.06% | -15.42% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -2.54% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -3.09% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.85% | +0.55% |
Volatility
FLV vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is 2.45%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that FLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 3.19% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 7.56% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 9.73% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 12.82% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 15.73% | -1.48% |
FLV vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLV vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than HDV's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLV American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.90% | 2.07% | 2.07% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLV and HDV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to FLV (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLV dropped -15.06% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 5-year performance, HDV leads with 10.32% vs 8.47% for FLV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDV has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for FLV.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.67% for FLV.
FLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for FLV and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLV and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer