FLCB vs. SGOV
FLCB (Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. FLCB is actively managed, while SGOV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCB returned -0.05%/yr vs 3.58%/yr for SGOV. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
FLCB vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.71% return.
FLCB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCB vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCB Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF | 0.50% | 6.95% | 1.59% | 5.72% | -13.54% | -1.73% | 2.89% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.71% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCB and SGOV is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCB vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
FLCB
SGOV
FLCB vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLCB | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -271.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 194.05 | -192.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 395.07 | -393.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.38 | 4,426.92 | -4,422.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLCB vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCB drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCB and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCB | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -0.03% | -18.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | -0.01% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.16% | -0.01% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.48% | -0.03% | -18.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | 0.00% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -0.00% | -6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.00% | +0.99% |
Volatility
FLCB vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that FLCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCB | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.06% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 0.13% | +2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 0.19% | +3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 0.24% | +5.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.49% | 0.24% | +5.25% |
FLCB vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCB vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
FLCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than SGOV's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCB Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF | 4.29% | 4.19% | 4.10% | 3.40% | 2.73% | 2.28% | 3.24% | 0.73% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.85% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCB and SGOV have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCB has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCB dropped -18.82% vs SGOV's -0.03%.
On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.58% vs -0.05% for FLCB. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.58% return vs -0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLCB.
FLCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.
FLCB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLCB and 0.09% for SGOV.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.32 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCB and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer