FLUD vs. GSST
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Liberty Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST).
FLUD and GSST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLUD is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 14, 2020. GSST is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 15, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLUD or GSST.
Correlation
The correlation between FLUD and GSST is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLUD vs. GSST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLUD:
2.82
GSST:
8.15
FLUD:
4.41
GSST:
15.62
FLUD:
1.62
GSST:
4.22
FLUD:
8.82
GSST:
23.95
FLUD:
34.31
GSST:
159.53
FLUD:
0.15%
GSST:
0.04%
FLUD:
1.85%
GSST:
0.73%
FLUD:
-1.66%
GSST:
-3.51%
FLUD:
0.00%
GSST:
0.00%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLUD having a 1.64% return and GSST slightly higher at 1.67%.
FLUD
1.64%
0.21%
2.42%
5.21%
N/A
N/A
GSST
1.67%
0.36%
2.55%
5.90%
3.26%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLUD vs. GSST - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLUD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSST's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLUD vs. GSST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLUD
GSST
FLUD vs. GSST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLUD vs. GSST - Dividend Comparison
FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, less than GSST's 5.30% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUD Franklin Liberty Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.74% | 4.97% | 4.72% | 1.39% | 0.92% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
GSST Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.30% | 5.45% | 4.98% | 1.97% | 0.71% | 1.12% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
FLUD vs. GSST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLUD drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum GSST drawdown of -3.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUD and GSST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLUD vs. GSST - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Liberty Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) at 0.46%. This indicates that FLUD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.