PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCB vs. FLGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCB vs. FLGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCB achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly higher than FLGV's -0.65% return.


FLCB

1D
-0.31%
1M
-1.27%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.55%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.74%

FLGV

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.65%
1Y
1.12%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.07M$9.57M$9.69M
$2.18M$1.69M$2.18M

FLCB vs. FLGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
-0.55%6.95%1.59%5.72%-13.54%-1.73%2.23%
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
-0.65%6.22%0.62%4.18%-11.53%-2.39%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCB and FLGV is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.92

The correlation between FLCB and FLGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCB vs. FLGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCB
FLCB Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FLCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGV
FLGV Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FLGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGV Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCB vs. FLGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCBFLGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.09

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

0.72

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

1.73

+0.70

FLCB vs. FLGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the FLGV Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCB and FLGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCB vs. FLGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCB drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, which is greater than FLGV's maximum drawdown of -17.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCB and FLGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCBFLGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-17.63%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-2.82%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-5.00%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.45%

-15.26%

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-6.21%

+3.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-8.64%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

1.16%

-0.03%

Volatility

FLCB vs. FLGV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) have volatilities of 0.92% and 0.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCBFLGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.93%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

2.74%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

3.66%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

5.43%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.47%

5.12%

+0.35%

FLCB vs. FLGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLCB vs. FLGV - Dividend Comparison

FLCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than FLGV's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
3.99%4.19%4.10%3.40%2.73%2.28%3.24%0.73%
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
3.86%4.07%4.13%3.46%2.21%1.92%0.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLCB and FLGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLGV has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to FLCB (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCB dropped -18.82% vs FLGV's -17.63%.

On 5-year performance, FLCB leads with -0.49% vs -0.65% for FLGV. On fees, FLGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLCB has performed better with a -0.49% return vs -0.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLCB.

FLCB has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.86% for FLGV.

FLCB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FLGV is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLCB and 0.09% for FLGV.

FLCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCB and FLGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer