FLUD vs. BCD
FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) and BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLUD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while BCD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLUD returned 3.69%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for BCD. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. FLUD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BCD.
Performance
FLUD vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLUD achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 13.57% return.
FLUD
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
BCD
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 21.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
FLUD vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.83% | 5.36% | 5.44% | 5.95% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.71% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.57% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 18.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLUD and BCD is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020 | -0.02 |
The correlation between FLUD and BCD shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLUD vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank
FLUD
BCD
FLUD vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLUD | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.29 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.86 | 1.79 | +8.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.26 | 6.21 | +34.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLUD vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLUD drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum BCD drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUD and BCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLUD | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -29.81% | +28.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.44% | -12.70% | +12.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.59% | -12.70% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.66% | -23.03% | +21.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -9.11% | +9.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -9.85% | +9.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 3.64% | -3.53% |
Volatility
FLUD vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) is 0.33%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that FLUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLUD | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 4.04% | -3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.77% | 11.94% | -11.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57% | 14.07% | -12.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.34% | 15.38% | -14.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.26% | 13.91% | -12.65% |
FLUD vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLUD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLUD vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than BCD's 15.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.16% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.16% | 4.51% | 4.97% | 4.72% | 1.39% | 0.92% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLUD and BCD have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCD has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to FLUD (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUD dropped -1.66% vs BCD's -29.81%.
On 5-year performance, BCD leads with 10.85% vs 3.69% for FLUD. On fees, FLUD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLUD has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BCD has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLUD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BCD.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 15.16%, compared with 4.16% for FLUD.
FLUD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BCD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLUD and 0.29% for BCD.
FLUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLUD and BCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer