FLTW vs. SPDW
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW).
FLTW and SPDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLTW is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. SPDW is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2007. Both FLTW and SPDW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLTW or SPDW.
Correlation
The correlation between FLTW and SPDW is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLTW vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLTW:
0.14
SPDW:
0.63
FLTW:
0.38
SPDW:
1.00
FLTW:
1.05
SPDW:
1.13
FLTW:
0.14
SPDW:
0.80
FLTW:
0.46
SPDW:
2.46
FLTW:
7.92%
SPDW:
4.40%
FLTW:
26.67%
SPDW:
17.27%
FLTW:
-38.00%
SPDW:
-60.02%
FLTW:
-16.62%
SPDW:
-0.61%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 9.99% return.
FLTW
-10.97%
-7.20%
-15.06%
2.91%
14.04%
N/A
SPDW
9.99%
1.13%
5.78%
11.60%
11.75%
5.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTW vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTW has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLTW vs. SPDW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLTW
SPDW
FLTW vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLTW vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
FLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SPDW's 2.90% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 2.12% | 1.89% | 2.85% | 3.16% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 3.00% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.90% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.79% | 3.51% |
Drawdowns
FLTW vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and SPDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLTW vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a higher volatility of 15.98% compared to SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) at 11.45%. This indicates that FLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.