FLTW vs. FLJH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTW is a Taiwan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index, while FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLTW returned 18.91%/yr vs 20.99%/yr for FLJH. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLTW charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJH.

Performance

FLTW vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 53.07% return, which is significantly higher than FLJH's 17.94% return.

FLTW

• 1D: 3.38%
• 1M: -8.11%
• 6M: 41.10%
• YTD: 53.07%
• 1Y: 78.62%
• 3Y*: 36.54%
• 5Y*: 18.91%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.45%

FLJH

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -2.57%
• 6M: 12.39%
• YTD: 17.94%
• 1Y: 38.04%
• 3Y*: 25.03%
• 5Y*: 20.99%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	$717.48K	$1.02M	$1.16M
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	$79.26M	$58.46M	$67.03M

FLTW vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	53.07%	32.00%	16.68%	30.05%	-27.51%	29.46%	29.77%	31.23%	-9.32%	-1.28%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	17.94%	25.26%	25.89%	36.02%	-2.75%	12.68%	10.65%	20.34%	-14.66%	1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTW and FLJH is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.49

The correlation between FLTW and FLJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLTW vs. FLJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLTW	FLJH
Technology	77.2%	23.1%
Financial Services	12.5%	16.2%
Industrials	3.0%	23.5%
Basic Materials	2.9%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	1.6%	12.1%
Communication Services	1.3%	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.7%	4.0%
Healthcare	0.7%	5.2%
Energy	0.1%	0.8%
Real Estate	-	2.9%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

FLTW vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 90
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLTW vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLTW	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.89	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.55	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.34	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.73	3.35	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.39	11.93	+3.46

FLTW vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTW and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLTW vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and FLJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLTW	FLJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.00%	-31.51%	-6.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.34%	-10.80%	-10.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.45%	-20.39%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.00%	-20.39%	-17.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.83%	-5.87%	-8.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-5.27%	-3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.16%	3.03%	+2.13%

Volatility

FLTW vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 6.34%. This indicates that FLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLTW	FLJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.59%	6.34%	+7.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.76%	15.23%	+13.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.00%	19.17%	+12.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.04%	18.75%	+5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.60%	19.88%	+2.72%

FLTW vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTW has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLTW vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

FLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FLJH's 2.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	2.55%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.76%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLTW and FLJH in my portfolio?

FLTW and FLJH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLTW or FLJH?

FLTW has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to FLJH (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTW dropped -38.00% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

Which ETF is better, FLTW or FLJH?

On 5-year performance, FLJH leads with 20.99% vs 18.91% for FLTW. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLTW or FLJH?

Over the 5-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 20.99% return vs 18.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLTW or FLJH?

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLTW or FLJH?

FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.76% for FLTW.

What is the main difference between FLTW and FLJH?

FLTW is categorized as Taiwan Equities, while FLJH is Japan Equities. FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLTW and 0.09% for FLJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.