FLTR.L vs. HL
FLTR.L (Flutter Entertainment plc) and HL (Hecla Mining Company) are both stocks. FLTR.L operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while HL operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, FLTR.L returned -10.32%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for HL. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLTR.L vs. HL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FLTR.L is traded in GBp, while HL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR.L achieves a -50.01% return, which is significantly lower than HL's -19.88% return.
FLTR.L
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- 15.53%
- YTD
- -50.01%
- 6M
- -51.70%
- 1Y
- -59.06%
- 3Y*
- -20.04%
- 5Y*
- -10.32%
- 10Y*
- —
HL
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -21.39%
- YTD
- -19.88%
- 6M
- -18.88%
- 1Y
- 157.88%
- 3Y*
- 40.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
FLTR.L vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR.L Flutter Entertainment plc | -50.01% | -22.15% | 48.64% | 23.47% | -4.00% | -22.17% | 69.22% | 64.62% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | -19.88% | 263.79% | 4.62% | -17.28% | 19.71% | -18.21% | 86.20% | 134.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR.L and HL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2019 | 0.11 |
The correlation between FLTR.L and HL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLTR.L:
£14.27B
HL:
$10.32B
FLTR.L:
-$4.14
HL:
$0.84
FLTR.L:
0.81
HL:
6.47
FLTR.L:
2.12
HL:
4.02
FLTR.L:
$23.82B
HL:
$1.57B
FLTR.L:
$7.40B
HL:
$788.95M
FLTR.L:
$3.03B
HL:
$864.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR.L vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR.L
HL
FLTR.L vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLTR.L | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 1.34 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.92 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 6.64 | -8.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLTR.L vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR.L drawdown since its inception was -70.59%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -89.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR.L and HL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR.L | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.59% | -89.37% | +18.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.91% | -54.92% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.59% | -54.92% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.59% | -56.92% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.87% | -51.06% | -14.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.06% | -49.87% | +30.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.67% | 24.13% | +18.54% |
Volatility
FLTR.L vs. HL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) is 12.29%, while Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a volatility of 21.57%. This indicates that FLTR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR.L | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.29% | 21.57% | -9.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.23% | 53.40% | -19.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.97% | 70.99% | -29.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.82% | 56.53% | -18.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.65% | 61.10% | -22.45% |
Dividends
FLTR.L vs. HL - Dividend Comparison
FLTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR.L Flutter Entertainment plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
FLTR.L vs. HL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flutter Entertainment plc and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLTR.L vs. HL - Profitability Comparison
FLTR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported a gross profit of 2.11B and revenue of 12.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
FLTR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported an operating income of 258.00M and revenue of 12.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
FLTR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported a net income of -334.62M and revenue of 12.18B, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR.L and HL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FLTR.L and HL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer