FLTMX vs. ATOIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLTMX (Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund) and ATOIX (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FLTMX returned 2.18%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for ATOIX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTMX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ATOIX.

Performance

FLTMX vs. ATOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTMX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than ATOIX's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTMX has outperformed ATOIX with an annualized return of 2.18%, while ATOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.

FLTMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 6.15%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: 1.30%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

ATOIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 1.54%
• 1Y: 3.02%
• 3Y*: 3.08%
• 5Y*: 2.30%
• 10Y*: 1.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTMX vs. ATOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund	0.90%	6.02%	1.19%	5.52%	-6.92%	0.83%	4.36%	6.34%	1.89%	4.50%
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund	1.01%	3.33%	3.14%	3.27%	0.87%	-0.04%	0.88%	1.40%	1.54%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTMX and ATOIX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2002	0.27

Return for Risk

FLTMX vs. ATOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTMX

FLTMX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FLTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FLTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

ATOIX

ATOIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
ATOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ATOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
ATOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
ATOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
ATOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTMX vs. ATOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLTMX	ATOIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	3.50	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.16	17.32	-13.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	10.98	-9.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	30.48	-28.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.59	89.66	-83.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLTMX vs. ATOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the ATOIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTMX and ATOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLTMX	ATOIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	3.50	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	2.80	-2.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	2.28	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	2.47	-1.11

Drawdowns

FLTMX vs. ATOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTMX drawdown since its inception was -16.13%, which is greater than ATOIX's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTMX and ATOIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLTMX	ATOIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.13%	-1.46%	-14.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-0.10%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.88%	-0.10%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.91%	-0.37%	-10.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.91%	-0.43%	-10.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	0.00%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-0.06%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.03%	+0.91%

Volatility

FLTMX vs. ATOIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) at 0.20%. This indicates that FLTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLTMX	ATOIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.89%	0.20%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.83%	0.61%	+1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28%	0.87%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.05%	0.83%	+2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.24%	0.79%	+2.45%

FLTMX vs. ATOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTMX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than ATOIX's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLTMX vs. ATOIX - Dividend Comparison

FLTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than ATOIX's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund	2.98%	3.27%	3.09%	3.02%	1.07%	0.06%	0.88%	1.39%	1.42%	2.20%	0.61%	0.52%
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund	2.88%	3.70%	2.47%	2.42%	1.36%	1.67%	2.00%	2.39%	3.31%	2.64%	3.20%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLTMX and ATOIX in my portfolio?

FLTMX and ATOIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLTMX or ATOIX?

FLTMX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to ATOIX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTMX dropped -16.13% vs ATOIX's -1.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ATOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.