PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTKX vs. FKRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTKX achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's 6.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTKX has underperformed FKRCX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while FKRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.96% annualized return.


FLTKX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.70%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.30%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
11.40%

FKRCX

1D
1.17%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.83%
6M
19.04%
1Y
85.44%
3Y*
53.81%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
15.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTKX
Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund
12.30%21.87%16.05%19.58%-17.27%17.56%16.18%22.67%-7.16%17.32%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
6.83%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%-18.11%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTKX and FKRCX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTKX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTKX
FLTKX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTKXFKRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.82

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

7.91

+5.67

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTKX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTKXFKRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.09

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.65

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.49

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.19

+0.49

Drawdowns

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTKX drawdown since its inception was -35.72%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTKX and FKRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTKXFKRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

-78.85%

+43.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-31.15%

+21.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-31.15%

+15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.72%

-48.79%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

-49.54%

+13.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.60%

+20.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-33.74%

+26.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

11.07%

-8.92%

Volatility

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) is 3.42%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 13.60%. This indicates that FLTKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTKXFKRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

13.60%

-10.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

35.14%

-25.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

42.21%

-30.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

33.82%

-15.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

32.85%

-16.18%

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTKX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

FLTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, less than FKRCX's 10.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
10.06%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%
FLTKX
Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund
5.22%5.86%2.70%2.31%4.02%19.28%2.35%2.08%3.98%0.54%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTKX and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKRCX has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to FLTKX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTKX dropped -35.72% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

FLTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTKX and FKRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer