PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTKX vs. FKRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTKX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's -10.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLTKX having a 11.06% annualized return and FKRCX not far ahead at 11.52%.


FLTKX

1D
2.23%
1M
-0.29%
6M
6.92%
YTD
10.30%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
11.06%
ALL TIME*
10.82%

FKRCX

1D
3.29%
1M
-4.25%
6M
-18.81%
YTD
-10.16%
1Y
65.72%
3Y*
45.65%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
11.52%
ALL TIME*
6.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTKX
Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund
10.30%21.87%16.05%19.58%-17.27%17.56%16.18%22.67%-7.16%17.32%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
-10.16%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%-18.11%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTKX and FKRCX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.34

The correlation between FLTKX and FKRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTKX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLTKX
FLTKX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FLTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTKXFKRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.77

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

3.96

+5.17

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTKX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTKX drawdown since its inception was -35.72%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTKX and FKRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTKXFKRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.72%

-78.85%

+43.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-37.40%

+27.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-37.40%

+21.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.72%

-48.79%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.72%

-49.54%

+13.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-33.23%

+31.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-33.73%

+26.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

16.69%

-14.42%

Volatility

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) is 4.12%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 13.21%. This indicates that FLTKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTKXFKRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

13.21%

-9.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

38.56%

-27.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

45.97%

-32.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

34.78%

-16.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.69%

33.22%

-16.53%

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTKX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTKX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

FLTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than FKRCX's 11.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
11.96%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%
FLTKX
Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund
5.36%5.86%2.70%2.31%4.02%19.28%2.35%2.08%3.98%0.54%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTKX and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKRCX has higher volatility (13.21%) compared to FLTKX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTKX dropped -35.72% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

FLTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTKX and FKRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer