FLTKX vs. DRIKX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FLTKX (Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund) and DRIKX (Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FLTKX returned 11.74%/yr vs 12.92%/yr for DRIKX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FLTKX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DRIKX.

Performance

FLTKX vs. DRIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLTKX having a 11.86% return and DRIKX slightly lower at 11.47%. Over the past 10 years, FLTKX has underperformed DRIKX with an annualized return of 11.74%, while DRIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.92% annualized return.

FLTKX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 27.52%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: 11.74%

DRIKX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 11.47%
• 6M: 10.69%
• 1Y: 26.05%
• 3Y*: 19.63%
• 5Y*: 11.49%
• 10Y*: 12.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTKX vs. DRIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLTKX Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund	11.86%	21.87%	16.05%	19.58%	-17.27%	17.56%	16.18%	22.67%	-7.16%	17.32%
DRIKX Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	11.47%	19.29%	17.19%	21.26%	-15.32%	21.28%	14.20%	25.63%	-9.16%	21.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTKX and DRIKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.96

The correlation between FLTKX and DRIKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLTKX vs. DRIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTKX

FLTKX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FLTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FLTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FLTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FLTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FLTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

DRIKX

DRIKX Risk / Return Rank: 79
DRIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DRIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DRIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
DRIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DRIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTKX vs. DRIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) and Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLTKX	DRIKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.44	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	3.37	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	3.37	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.07	14.48	-1.41

FLTKX vs. DRIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the DRIKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTKX and DRIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLTKX vs. DRIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTKX drawdown since its inception was -35.72%, which is greater than DRIKX's maximum drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTKX and DRIKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLTKX	DRIKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.72%	-33.48%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-8.59%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.73%	-16.02%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.72%	-23.49%	-12.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.72%	-33.48%	-2.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.82%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-4.23%	-2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	1.94%	+0.25%

Volatility

FLTKX vs. DRIKX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIKX) at 4.47%. This indicates that FLTKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLTKX	DRIKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	4.47%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.75%	9.56%	+1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.88%	11.88%	+1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.13%	14.92%	+3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	15.78%	+0.94%

FLTKX vs. DRIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTKX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIKX's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLTKX vs. DRIKX - Dividend Comparison

FLTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than DRIKX's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DRIKX Dimensional 2055 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	1.33%	1.24%	2.44%	3.19%	3.92%	2.37%	2.41%	2.12%	2.27%	1.18%	1.39%
FLTKX Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund	5.29%	5.86%	2.70%	2.31%	4.02%	19.28%	2.35%	2.08%	3.98%	0.54%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLTKX and DRIKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FLTKX and DRIKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLTKX or DRIKX?

FLTKX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DRIKX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTKX dropped -35.72% vs DRIKX's -33.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.