PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTB vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTB vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than JPLD's 1.12% return.


FLTB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
2.47%

JPLD

1D
0.08%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.52%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTB vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
0.84%6.60%5.14%3.64%
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
1.12%6.01%6.49%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTB and JPLD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023

0.64

The correlation between FLTB and JPLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLTB vs. JPLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLTB
JPLD

Technology

0.0%
7.4%

Financial Services

0.0%
13.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.1%

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

5.6%

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

7.8%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

FLTB
0.0%
JPLD
7.4%

Financial Services

FLTB
0.0%
JPLD
13.7%

Basic Materials

FLTB

-

JPLD
1.4%

Communication Services

FLTB

-

JPLD
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLTB

-

JPLD
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLTB

-

JPLD
0.1%

Energy

FLTB

-

JPLD
0.1%

Healthcare

FLTB

-

JPLD
5.6%

Industrials

FLTB

-

JPLD
0.1%

Real Estate

FLTB

-

JPLD
7.8%

Utilities

FLTB

-

JPLD
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTB vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTB
FLTB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTB vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTBJPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.66

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

4.61

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.23

21.36

-9.14

FLTB vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTB and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTBJPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

3.17

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

3.26

-2.43

Drawdowns

FLTB vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and JPLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTBJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-1.17%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

-1.00%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.04%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-0.15%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.22%

+0.14%

Volatility

FLTB vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.37%. This indicates that FLTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTBJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.37%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

0.97%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

1.47%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

1.83%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

1.83%

+1.11%

FLTB vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLTB vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than JPLD's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
4.36%4.31%4.11%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
4.20%4.24%4.47%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTB and JPLD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTB has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to JPLD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTB dropped -9.37% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

On 1-year performance, JPLD leads with 4.61% vs 4.37% for FLTB. On fees, JPLD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JPLD has performed better with a 4.61% return vs 4.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPLD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLTB.

FLTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 4.20% for JPLD.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLTB and 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTB and JPLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer