PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTB vs. FUTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTB vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than FUTY's 4.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTB has underperformed FUTY with an annualized return of 2.45%, while FUTY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return.


FLTB

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.94%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
2.45%

FUTY

1D
0.79%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
4.60%
6M
3.78%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTB vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
0.61%6.60%5.14%5.94%-5.88%-1.20%5.57%5.87%1.06%2.10%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
4.60%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTB and FUTY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014

0.19

The correlation between FLTB and FUTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLTB vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLTB
FUTY

Technology

0.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

99.2%

Technology

FLTB
0.0%
FUTY

-

Financial Services

FLTB
0.0%
FUTY

-

Basic Materials

FLTB

-

FUTY

-

Communication Services

FLTB

-

FUTY

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLTB

-

FUTY

-

Consumer Defensive

FLTB

-

FUTY

-

Energy

FLTB

-

FUTY
0.5%

Healthcare

FLTB

-

FUTY

-

Industrials

FLTB

-

FUTY
0.2%

Real Estate

FLTB

-

FUTY

-

Utilities

FLTB

-

FUTY
99.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTB vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTB
FLTB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTB vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTBFUTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.17

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.48

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

3.30

+8.55

FLTB vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTB and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTBFUTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.93

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.55

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.48

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.56

+0.27

Drawdowns

FLTB vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and FUTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTBFUTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-36.44%

+27.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.52%

-8.93%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.52%

-17.35%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.26%

-25.11%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.37%

-36.44%

+27.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-5.99%

+5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-6.03%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

4.00%

-3.64%

Volatility

FLTB vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) is 0.62%, while Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that FLTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTBFUTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

5.49%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

11.41%

-9.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

14.25%

-12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

17.08%

-14.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

19.05%

-16.11%

FLTB vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLTB vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than FUTY's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTB
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
4.37%4.31%4.11%3.20%1.63%0.89%1.56%2.67%2.50%1.78%1.59%1.63%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.58%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTB and FUTY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTY has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FLTB (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTB dropped -9.37% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

On 10-year performance, FUTY leads with 9.20% vs 2.45% for FLTB. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FLTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FUTY has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLTB.

FLTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 2.58% for FUTY.

FLTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLTB and 0.08% for FUTY.

FLTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTB and FUTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer