PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSW vs. FDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSW vs. FDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than FDD's 11.53% return.


FLSW

1D
-1.60%
1M
1.15%
YTD
1.77%
6M
5.12%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*

FDD

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.51%
YTD
11.53%
6M
17.78%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSW vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
1.77%32.92%-1.77%16.79%-18.14%20.82%13.25%31.66%-7.85%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
11.53%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSW and FDD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.67

The correlation between FLSW and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLSW vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLSW
FDD

Healthcare

37.4%

-

Financial Services

18.0%
52.2%

Consumer Defensive

14.0%
3.7%

Industrials

13.8%
12.5%

Basic Materials

7.7%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
12.3%

Real Estate

1.3%
3.5%

Communication Services

1.2%
2.1%

Technology

1.1%

-

Utilities

0.2%
6.0%

Energy

-

10.8%

Healthcare

FLSW
37.4%
FDD

-

Financial Services

FLSW
18.0%
FDD
52.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLSW
14.0%
FDD
3.7%

Industrials

FLSW
13.8%
FDD
12.5%

Basic Materials

FLSW
7.7%
FDD
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLSW
5.2%
FDD
12.3%

Real Estate

FLSW
1.3%
FDD
3.5%

Communication Services

FLSW
1.2%
FDD
2.1%

Technology

FLSW
1.1%
FDD

-

Utilities

FLSW
0.2%
FDD
6.0%

Energy

FLSW

-

FDD
10.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSW vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSW
FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSW vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSWFDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.37

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

3.53

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

11.86

-8.62

FLSW vs. FDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSW Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FDD Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSW and FDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSWFDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.16

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.60

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.10

+0.46

Drawdowns

FLSW vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and FDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSWFDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.16%

-74.77%

+46.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-9.39%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-13.06%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.16%

-35.11%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.34%

-2.26%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-35.47%

+29.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

2.79%

+1.32%

Volatility

FLSW vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSWFDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

5.22%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

12.35%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

15.43%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

18.39%

-2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

20.16%

-3.27%

FLSW vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSW vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison

FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than FDD's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.55%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
2.08%2.12%2.04%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSW and FDD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDD has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to FLSW (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs FDD's -74.77%.

On 5-year performance, FDD leads with 11.03% vs 6.80% for FLSW. On fees, FLSW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDD has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.08% for FLSW.

FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLSW and 0.58% for FDD.

FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSW and FDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer