FLSW vs. DIVI
FLSW (Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. FLSW is passively managed, while DIVI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLSW returned 6.80%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for DIVI. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
FLSW vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLSW achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 10.89% return.
FLSW
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 13.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 10.89%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- —
FLSW vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 1.77% | 32.92% | -1.77% | 16.79% | -18.14% | 20.82% | 13.25% | 31.66% | -7.85% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 10.89% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSW and DIVI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FLSW and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLSW vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLSW
DIVI
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
FLSW
DIVI
Financial Services
FLSW
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FLSW
DIVI
Industrials
FLSW
DIVI
Basic Materials
FLSW
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FLSW
DIVI
Real Estate
FLSW
DIVI
Communication Services
FLSW
DIVI
Technology
FLSW
DIVI
Utilities
FLSW
DIVI
Energy
FLSW
-
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSW vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FLSW
DIVI
FLSW vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLSW | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.32 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.55 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 9.83 | -6.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLSW | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.82 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.88 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.67 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
FLSW vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSW drawdown since its inception was -28.16%, roughly equal to the maximum DIVI drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSW and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSW | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -27.76% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -10.54% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -14.58% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.16% | -18.53% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.34% | -1.01% | -5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -3.63% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 2.73% | +1.38% |
Volatility
FLSW vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSW | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 5.11% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 12.18% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 14.84% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 15.30% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 16.46% | +0.43% |
FLSW vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FLSW and DIVI have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLSW vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FLSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than DIVI's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.53% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLSW Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF | 2.08% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.86% | 2.28% | 1.15% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLSW and DIVI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLSW has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to DIVI (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSW dropped -28.16% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.44% vs 6.80% for FLSW. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLSW and DIVI have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.08% for FLSW.
FLSW is categorized as Europe Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLSW and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer