PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSP vs. WTIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSP vs. WTIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSP achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than WTIP's 8.23% return.


FLSP

1D
1.51%
1M
3.43%
6M
4.81%
YTD
5.20%
1Y
17.32%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.56%

WTIP

1D
-0.68%
1M
2.64%
6M
8.21%
YTD
8.23%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.89M$2.48M$2.72M
$277.97K$201.70K$260.15K

FLSP vs. WTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLSP and WTIP is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSP vs. WTIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIP
WTIP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
WTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLSP vs. WTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLSPWTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

1.32

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

3.83

+9.56

FLSP vs. WTIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSP Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the WTIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSP and WTIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLSP vs. WTIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSP drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, which is greater than WTIP's maximum drawdown of -16.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSP and WTIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSPWTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.75%

-16.52%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-16.52%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.25%

+13.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-3.10%

-3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

5.70%

-4.35%

Volatility

FLSP vs. WTIP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund (WTIP) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSPWTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.96%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

15.51%

-8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.88%

17.17%

-8.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

16.68%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

16.68%

-3.26%

FLSP vs. WTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLSP and WTIP have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

FLSP vs. WTIP - Dividend Comparison

FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than WTIP's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.52%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%
WTIP
WisdomTree Inflation Plus Fund
4.12%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSP and WTIP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSP has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to WTIP (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSP dropped -22.75% vs WTIP's -16.52%.

On 1-year performance, WTIP leads with 22.59% vs 17.32% for FLSP. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTIP has performed better with a 22.59% return vs 17.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSP and WTIP have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

WTIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.52% for FLSP.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree.

FLSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSP and WTIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer