PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSOX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSOX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSOX achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than PTDIX's 7.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FLSOX has outperformed PTDIX with an annualized return of 11.45%, while PTDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.


FLSOX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.77%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.79%
1Y
27.96%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
11.45%

PTDIX

1D
0.51%
1M
3.17%
YTD
7.44%
6M
8.09%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSOX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLSOX
Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund
11.53%21.51%15.86%19.58%-17.26%17.71%16.53%22.44%-7.23%19.20%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.44%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%24.91%-7.95%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSOX and PTDIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.96

The correlation between FLSOX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSOX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSOX
FLSOX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSOX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSOXPTDIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.01

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.40

2.85

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.67

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.63

11.89

+1.75

FLSOX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSOX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSOXPTDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.01

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.61

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.76

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.48

+0.10

Drawdowns

FLSOX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSOX drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, smaller than the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSOX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSOXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.36%

-54.38%

+15.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-7.32%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-13.05%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.36%

-25.43%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.36%

-30.02%

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-7.49%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.64%

+0.46%

Volatility

FLSOX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) at 2.89%. This indicates that FLSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSOXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.89%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

7.85%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.75%

9.83%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.33%

13.49%

+6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

13.83%

+4.13%

FLSOX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSOX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLSOX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

FLSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than PTDIX's 9.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLSOX
Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund
5.67%6.32%2.59%1.97%4.39%26.85%3.04%2.33%4.40%1.95%1.79%2.99%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.12%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FLSOX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLSOX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PTDIX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSOX dropped -39.36% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

FLSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSOX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer