PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSOX vs. FKGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSOX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSOX achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than FKGRX's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FLSOX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 11.45%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.16% annualized return.


FLSOX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.77%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.79%
1Y
27.96%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
11.45%

FKGRX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.54%
YTD
7.40%
6M
7.10%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
14.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSOX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLSOX
Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund
11.53%21.51%15.86%19.58%-17.26%17.71%16.53%22.44%-7.23%19.20%
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
7.40%15.38%17.96%27.54%-25.32%21.61%30.71%32.08%-3.37%26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSOX and FKGRX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.92

The correlation between FLSOX and FKGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSOX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSOX
FLSOX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FLSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FKGRX
FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSOX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSOXFKGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

1.66

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.40

2.32

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.29

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.87

+1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.63

7.63

+6.00

FLSOX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSOX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSOXFKGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.66

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.50

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.73

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.71

-0.13

Drawdowns

FLSOX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSOX drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, smaller than the maximum FKGRX drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSOX and FKGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSOXFKGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.36%

-51.08%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-11.48%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-21.72%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.36%

-32.22%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.36%

-32.52%

-6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-6.74%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.81%

-0.71%

Volatility

FLSOX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) at 3.08%. This indicates that FLSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSOXFKGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.08%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

10.11%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.75%

12.99%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.33%

19.59%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

19.53%

-1.57%

FLSOX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSOX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FKGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSOX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

FLSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than FKGRX's 13.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
13.38%14.37%8.34%6.26%10.49%9.19%7.97%5.75%1.65%2.38%3.26%3.88%
FLSOX
Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund
5.67%6.32%2.59%1.97%4.39%26.85%3.04%2.33%4.40%1.95%1.79%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLSOX and FKGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLSOX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FKGRX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSOX dropped -39.36% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

FLSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSOX and FKGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer