PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSOX vs. EMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSOX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. (EMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSOX achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FLSOX has outperformed EMO with an annualized return of 11.15%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return.


FLSOX

1D
2.19%
1M
-0.32%
6M
6.69%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
11.15%
ALL TIME*
9.66%

EMO

1D
1.14%
1M
5.46%
6M
10.79%
YTD
21.52%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
28.83%
5Y*
29.82%
10Y*
7.75%
ALL TIME*
4.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.85M$2.08M$2.48M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLSOX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLSOX
Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund
9.97%21.51%15.86%19.58%-17.26%17.71%16.53%22.44%-7.23%19.20%
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
21.52%7.38%44.45%31.76%40.13%74.70%-64.47%19.60%-25.73%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSOX and EMO is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.43

The correlation between FLSOX and EMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSOX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLSOX
FLSOX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FLSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EMO
EMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLSOX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLSOXEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.89

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

3.92

+5.22

FLSOX vs. EMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the EMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSOX and EMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLSOX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSOX drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSOX and EMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSOXEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.36%

-95.06%

+55.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-10.87%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-18.81%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.36%

-28.59%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.36%

-93.02%

+53.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.16%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-31.67%

+23.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

5.24%

-3.02%

Volatility

FLSOX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund (FLSOX) is 4.09%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. (EMO) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that FLSOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSOXEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

5.06%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

12.66%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

16.45%

-3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

26.05%

-5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

41.13%

-23.15%

FLSOX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSOX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 3.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSOX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison

FLSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than EMO's 8.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc.
8.35%9.41%7.16%6.79%6.71%6.71%15.82%10.94%16.39%10.85%9.76%11.88%
FLSOX
Franklin LifeSmart 2050 Retirement Target Fund
5.68%6.32%2.59%1.97%4.39%26.85%3.04%2.33%4.40%1.95%1.79%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSOX and EMO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMO has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to FLSOX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSOX dropped -39.36% vs EMO's -95.06%.

FLSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSOX and EMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer