FLSA vs. TJUN
FLSA (Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLSA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
FLSA vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLSA having a 5.04% return and TJUN slightly higher at 5.26%.
FLSA
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 0.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.65%
- 10Y*
- —
TJUN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLSA vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLSA Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | 5.04% | -0.08% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSA and TJUN is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSA vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
FLSA
TJUN
FLSA vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLSA | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLSA | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 2.49 | -2.13 |
Drawdowns
FLSA vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSA drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSA and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSA | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.31% | -4.47% | -33.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.86% | 0.00% | -15.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -0.60% | -11.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | — | — |
Volatility
FLSA vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSA | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 7.55% | +8.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 7.55% | +8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 7.55% | +11.86% |
FLSA vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLSA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLSA vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
FLSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSA Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | 3.82% | 4.01% | 3.01% | 3.09% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.16% | 3.18% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLSA and TJUN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLSA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLSA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
FLSA has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
FLSA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLSA and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for FLSA and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer