PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSA vs. OOSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSA vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSA achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than OOSP's 2.66% return.


FLSA

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6.38%
6M
5.27%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
0.86%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*

OOSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.82%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSA vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
6.38%-7.15%-6.47%
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
2.66%7.41%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSA and OOSP is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2024

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSA vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSA
FLSA Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FLSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

OOSP
OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSA vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLSAOOSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.38

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

4.97

-4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

18.41

-17.18

FLSA vs. OOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the OOSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSA and OOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLSA vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSA drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSA and OOSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSAOOSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-1.31%

-37.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-1.31%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.78%

0.00%

-14.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.21%

-0.20%

-12.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

0.35%

+4.77%

Volatility

FLSA vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) at 0.39%. This indicates that FLSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSAOOSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

0.39%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

2.17%

+10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

3.65%

+12.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

3.32%

+12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

3.32%

+16.07%

FLSA vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSA vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison

FLSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than OOSP's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FLSA
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF
1.22%4.01%3.01%3.09%1.90%1.95%2.16%3.18%
OOSP
Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF
6.45%6.71%5.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSA and OOSP have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSA has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to OOSP (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSA dropped -38.31% vs OOSP's -1.31%.

On 1-year performance, OOSP leads with 6.50% vs 6.30% for FLSA. On fees, FLSA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OOSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OOSP has performed better with a 6.50% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLSA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 1.22% for FLSA.

FLSA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLSA and 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSA and OOSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer