FLSA vs. EMCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLSA (Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF) and EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FLSA tracks the FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index while EMCR tracks the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLSA returned 2.65%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for EMCR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLSA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCR.

Performance

FLSA vs. EMCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSA achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than EMCR's 23.20% return.

FLSA

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -1.16%
• YTD: 5.04%
• 6M: 4.94%
• 1Y: 4.24%
• 3Y*: 0.78%
• 5Y*: 2.65%
• 10Y*: —

EMCR

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 8.67%
• YTD: 23.20%
• 6M: 25.84%
• 1Y: 50.54%
• 3Y*: 23.64%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSA vs. EMCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLSA Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF	5.04%	-7.15%	-0.29%	12.99%	-3.58%	35.72%	3.73%	9.46%	-0.48%
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF	23.20%	33.25%	9.69%	10.55%	-18.73%	5.54%	13.49%	22.41%	-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSA and EMCR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018	0.45

FLSA vs. EMCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLSA	EMCR
Financial Services	40.5%	20.7%
Basic Materials	15.7%	3.9%
Energy	13.9%	0.1%
Communication Services	9.4%	9.9%
Utilities	4.7%	1.5%
Industrials	3.7%	6.7%
Healthcare	3.5%	5.6%
Real Estate	3.0%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	10.6%
Technology	1.3%	36.2%

Return for Risk

FLSA vs. EMCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSA

FLSA Risk / Return Rank: 13
FLSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FLSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FLSA Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FLSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FLSA Martin Ratio Rank: 13

EMCR

EMCR Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EMCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EMCR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EMCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EMCR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSA vs. EMCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLSA	EMCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	2.59	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	3.36	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.47	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	3.67	-3.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.85	14.03	-13.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLSA vs. EMCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the EMCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSA and EMCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLSA	EMCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	2.59	-2.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.47	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.60	-0.24

Drawdowns

FLSA vs. EMCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSA drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, which is greater than EMCR's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSA and EMCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLSA	EMCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.31%	-34.28%	-4.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-13.84%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.95%	-18.38%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.25%	-34.28%	+7.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.86%	-1.34%	-14.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.20%	-9.33%	-2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.03%	3.61%	+1.42%

Volatility

FLSA vs. EMCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) is 3.54%, while Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that FLSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLSA	EMCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	8.10%	-4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	16.90%	-4.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.40%	19.60%	-3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	19.29%	-3.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.41%	19.86%	-0.45%

FLSA vs. EMCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCR's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLSA vs. EMCR - Dividend Comparison

FLSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than EMCR's 1.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF	1.97%	2.43%	6.62%	1.95%	3.05%	1.83%	1.75%	3.15%	0.19%
FLSA Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF	3.82%	4.01%	3.01%	3.09%	1.90%	1.95%	2.16%	3.18%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLSA and EMCR in my portfolio?

FLSA and EMCR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLSA or EMCR?

EMCR has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to FLSA (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSA dropped -38.31% vs EMCR's -34.28%.

Which ETF is better, FLSA or EMCR?

On 5-year performance, EMCR leads with 9.02% vs 2.65% for FLSA. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLSA or EMCR?

Over the 5-year period, EMCR has performed better with a 9.02% return vs 2.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLSA or EMCR?

EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FLSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLSA or EMCR?

FLSA has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 1.97% for EMCR.

What is the main difference between FLSA and EMCR?

FLSA tracks FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index, while EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLSA and 0.15% for EMCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.