EMCR vs. POWL
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL).
EMCR is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 6, 2018.
Performance
EMCR vs. POWL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMCR vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.10% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 22.41% | -1.76% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 73.89% | 44.49% | 152.21% | 155.62% | 24.34% | 3.60% | -37.60% | 101.58% | -10.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCR achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 73.89% return.
EMCR
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 29.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- —
POWL
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 73.89%
- 6M
- 74.89%
- 1Y
- 216.21%
- 3Y*
- 136.92%
- 5Y*
- 78.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCR vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank
EMCR
POWL
EMCR vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCR | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 3.73 | -2.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 3.71 | -1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 7.34 | -5.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.39 | 23.54 | -15.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCR | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 3.73 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 1.25 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.26 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCR and POWL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMCR vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison
EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than POWL's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 2.40% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.19% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Drawdowns
EMCR vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCR drawdown since its inception was -34.28%, smaller than the maximum POWL drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCR and POWL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCR | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | -73.10% | +38.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | -30.88% | +17.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.28% | -55.76% | +21.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.99% | -6.51% | -4.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -36.26% | +26.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 9.62% | -6.07% |
Volatility
EMCR vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is 10.62%, while Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) has a volatility of 20.88%. This indicates that EMCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMCR | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 20.88% | -10.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 43.67% | -28.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 58.41% | -37.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 63.13% | -44.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 54.20% | -34.52% |