FLS vs. JAAA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLS (Flowserve Corporation) is a stock, while JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) is CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 5 years, FLS returned 13.72%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for JAAA. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FLS vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLS achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than JAAA's 1.89% return.

FLS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 7.41%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 5.54%
• 1Y: 61.32%
• 3Y*: 31.97%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: 6.05%

JAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 5.10%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLS vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLS Flowserve Corporation	9.03%	22.45%	41.88%	37.32%	3.08%	-15.08%	28.53%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	1.89%	5.16%	7.43%	8.59%	0.49%	1.39%	0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FLS and JAAA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020	0.10

Return for Risk

FLS vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLS

FLS Risk / Return Rank: 79
FLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FLS Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FLS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

JAAA

JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 98
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLS vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowserve Corporation (FLS) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLS	JAAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	6.04	-4.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	10.13	-7.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	2.71	-1.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	13.18	-11.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.99	70.92	-64.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLS vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 6.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLS and JAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLS	JAAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	6.04	-4.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	2.87	-2.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	2.78	-2.52

Drawdowns

FLS vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLS drawdown since its inception was -77.36%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLS and JAAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLS	JAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.36%	-2.64%	-74.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.83%	-0.39%	-29.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.76%	-1.46%	-37.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.03%	-2.64%	-40.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.81%	-0.00%	-17.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.01%	-0.25%	-26.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.28%	0.07%	+10.21%

Volatility

FLS vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

Flowserve Corporation (FLS) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that FLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLS	JAAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.81%	0.13%	+12.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.50%	0.64%	+29.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.33%	0.85%	+47.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.00%	1.68%	+34.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.62%	1.64%	+35.98%

Dividends

FLS vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

FLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than JAAA's 5.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLS Flowserve Corporation	1.13%	1.21%	1.46%	1.94%	2.61%	2.61%	2.17%	1.91%	2.00%	1.35%	1.58%	1.71%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	5.00%	5.30%	6.35%	6.11%	2.74%	1.21%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLS and JAAA in my portfolio?

FLS and JAAA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLS or JAAA?

FLS has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLS dropped -77.36% vs JAAA's -2.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.04 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.