PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRG vs. SEIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLRG vs. SEIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLRG vs. SEIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
-2.67%13.92%23.36%18.31%3.22%
SEIQ
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF
-6.47%12.51%16.15%22.66%1.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly higher than SEIQ's -6.47% return.


FLRG

1D
2.17%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-3.46%
1Y
12.61%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*

SEIQ

1D
2.05%
1M
-6.43%
YTD
-6.47%
6M
-5.45%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLRG vs. SEIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLRG vs. SEIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG
FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIQ
SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG vs. SEIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRGSEIQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

0.35

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

0.62

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.09

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

0.61

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.15

2.49

+3.66

FLRG vs. SEIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the SEIQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and SEIQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRGSEIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

0.35

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.78

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and SEIQ is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLRG vs. SEIQ - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than SEIQ's 1.00% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.51%1.42%1.42%1.39%1.62%1.36%1.47%
SEIQ
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF
1.00%0.94%0.97%1.08%0.83%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. SEIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than SEIQ's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and SEIQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRGSEIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-14.87%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.72%

-10.25%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-7.58%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-2.76%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.53%

-0.21%

Volatility

FLRG vs. SEIQ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLRGSEIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

4.43%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

7.86%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

15.03%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

14.73%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

14.73%

+0.42%