FLRG vs. BDMAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FLRG (Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF) and BDMAX (BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund) are both funds - FLRG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while BDMAX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by BlackRock. FLRG is passively managed, while BDMAX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRG returned 13.32%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for BDMAX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLRG charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for BDMAX.

Performance

FLRG vs. BDMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than BDMAX's 11.86% return.

FLRG

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 9.67%
• 1Y: 19.94%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: —

BDMAX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 4.46%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 6M: 14.95%
• 1Y: 20.84%
• 3Y*: 21.37%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRG vs. BDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	9.53%	13.92%	23.36%	18.31%	-10.98%	29.36%	9.53%
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund	11.86%	18.08%	21.12%	14.27%	1.57%	3.11%	-2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and BDMAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020	0.15

Over the past year, FLRG and BDMAX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FLRG vs. BDMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG

FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 59
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BDMAX

BDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 91
BDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
BDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG vs. BDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLRG	BDMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	3.16	-1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	4.72	-1.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.60	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	5.89	-3.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.31	16.87	-5.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLRG vs. BDMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the BDMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and BDMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLRG	BDMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	3.16	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	1.93	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.18	-0.13

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. BDMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than BDMAX's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and BDMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRG	BDMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-12.37%	-7.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-3.55%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-4.15%	-12.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.64%	-6.49%	-13.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-9.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-2.82%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	1.26%	+0.55%

Volatility

FLRG vs. BDMAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund (BDMAX) at 1.98%. This indicates that FLRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRG	BDMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	1.98%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.58%	4.42%	+3.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	6.83%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	6.53%	+8.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.02%	5.82%	+9.20%

FLRG vs. BDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BDMAX's 1.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLRG vs. BDMAX - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than BDMAX's 7.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BDMAX BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund	7.99%	8.94%	13.39%	7.14%	0.00%	1.25%	0.04%	6.60%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	1.56%
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	1.34%	1.42%	1.42%	1.39%	1.62%	1.36%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRG and BDMAX in my portfolio?

FLRG and BDMAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLRG or BDMAX?

FLRG has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to BDMAX (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs BDMAX's -12.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.