FLQS vs. SMMV
FLQS (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - FLQS tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index while SMMV tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQS returned 5.27%/yr vs 4.87%/yr for SMMV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.
Performance
FLQS vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQS achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 2.04% return.
FLQS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FLQS vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 6.14% | 5.04% | 8.34% | 21.28% | -16.88% | 26.58% | 10.51% | 18.34% | -5.86% | 7.41% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.04% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | -2.88% | 24.21% | 1.15% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQS and SMMV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FLQS and SMMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLQS vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLQS
SMMV
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
FLQS
SMMV
Industrials
FLQS
SMMV
Consumer Cyclical
FLQS
SMMV
Financial Services
FLQS
SMMV
Healthcare
FLQS
SMMV
Consumer Defensive
FLQS
SMMV
Real Estate
FLQS
SMMV
Utilities
FLQS
SMMV
Energy
FLQS
SMMV
Basic Materials
FLQS
SMMV
Communication Services
FLQS
SMMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQS vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank
FLQS
SMMV
FLQS vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLQS | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.11 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.89 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 2.82 | +1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLQS | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.64 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.36 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.52 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
FLQS vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and SMMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQS | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -38.77% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -7.02% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -13.68% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.05% | -18.00% | -10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -4.44% | +3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -5.10% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.20% | +0.85% |
Volatility
FLQS vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.27%. This indicates that FLQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQS | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 2.27% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 6.30% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 9.73% | +5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 13.50% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 15.69% | +5.99% |
FLQS vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLQS vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than SMMV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.75% | 1.40% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.41% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.75% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLQS and SMMV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLQS has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQS dropped -42.16% vs SMMV's -38.77%.
On 5-year performance, FLQS leads with 5.27% vs 4.87% for SMMV. On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLQS has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.35% for FLQS.
FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLQS and 0.20% for SMMV.
FLQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLQS and SMMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer