FLQM vs. SRHQ

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FLQM (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FLQM tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index while SRHQ tracks the SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLQM returned 10.48%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for SRHQ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.

Performance

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQM achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than SRHQ's 19.86% return.

FLQM

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 5.47%
• 6M: 3.39%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 1Y: 10.67%
• 3Y*: 10.48%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: —

SRHQ

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 7.47%
• 6M: 15.34%
• YTD: 19.86%
• 1Y: 28.17%
• 3Y*: 16.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	6.71%	5.16%	14.32%	17.47%	5.29%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	19.86%	7.34%	16.49%	21.81%	5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQM and SRHQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2022	0.90

The correlation between FLQM and SRHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLQM	SRHQ
Consumer Cyclical	18.8%	13.9%
Industrials	17.9%	19.9%
Financial Services	15.1%	9.6%
Technology	13.4%	19.8%
Healthcare	12.3%	21.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	5.5%
Energy	5.3%	1.1%
Real Estate	4.3%	1.2%
Communication Services	3.3%	2.0%
Utilities	1.6%	1.2%
Basic Materials	0.2%	3.0%

Return for Risk

FLQM vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQM

FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 31
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 33

SRHQ

SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 82
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLQM	SRHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.90	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	2.69	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.33	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	4.49	-3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	15.73	-11.81

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the SRHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQM and SRHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQM drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQM and SRHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLQM	SRHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-18.50%	-18.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.57%	-6.31%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.70%	-18.50%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.66%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-3.00%	-1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	1.80%	+0.93%

Volatility

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) have volatilities of 4.08% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLQM	SRHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	4.26%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.86%	11.09%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.26%	14.88%	-2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	15.97%	+0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	15.97%	+2.45%

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLQM vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

FLQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than SRHQ's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.66%	1.49%	1.28%	1.27%	1.33%	1.05%	1.10%	1.37%	1.42%	1.15%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	0.69%	0.76%	0.66%	0.84%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLQM and SRHQ in my portfolio?

FLQM and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLQM or SRHQ?

SRHQ has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FLQM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQM dropped -37.26% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.

Which ETF is better, FLQM or SRHQ?

On 3-year performance, SRHQ leads with 16.68% vs 10.48% for FLQM. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLQM or SRHQ?

Over the 3-year period, SRHQ has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 10.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLQM or SRHQ?

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SRHQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLQM or SRHQ?

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.69% for SRHQ.

What is the main difference between FLQM and SRHQ?

FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index, while SRHQ tracks SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLQM and 0.35% for SRHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.