PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQM vs. SIXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLQM vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLQM vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
-2.14%5.16%14.32%17.47%-12.95%28.76%35.20%
SIXL
ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF
4.48%-0.61%14.13%2.38%-7.49%20.00%18.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQM achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than SIXL's 4.48% return.


FLQM

1D
1.55%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-2.14%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*

SIXL

1D
0.42%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
4.48%
6M
2.87%
1Y
2.42%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLQM vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLQM vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQM
FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXL
SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQM vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQMSIXLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.30

0.20

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.56

0.36

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.05

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

0.37

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.96

1.19

+0.76

FLQM vs. SIXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the SIXL Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQM and SIXL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQMSIXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

0.20

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.34

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.66

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between FLQM and SIXL is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLQM vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison

FLQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than SIXL's 2.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.56%1.49%1.28%1.27%1.33%1.05%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.15%
SIXL
ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF
2.37%2.31%1.28%1.48%1.45%0.67%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLQM vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQM drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQM and SIXL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQMSIXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-16.08%

-21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-8.63%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

-16.08%

-6.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.06%

-5.07%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-4.60%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.66%

+0.46%

Volatility

FLQM vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) at 3.02%. This indicates that FLQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLQMSIXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.02%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

6.76%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.46%

12.15%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

12.14%

+4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

12.64%

+5.96%