PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQM vs. FNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQM vs. FNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQM achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than FNX's 12.02% return.


FLQM

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.68%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

FNX

1D
0.82%
1M
1.97%
YTD
12.02%
6M
13.02%
1Y
28.41%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
11.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQM vs. FNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.19%5.16%14.32%17.47%-12.95%28.76%15.50%28.56%-4.24%10.32%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
12.02%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQM and FNX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.83

The correlation between FLQM and FNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQM vs. FNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQM
FNX

Consumer Cyclical

18.7%
14.4%

Industrials

18.4%
19.3%

Financial Services

15.4%
18.6%

Technology

12.4%
9.5%

Healthcare

12.2%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.0%

Energy

5.4%
6.2%

Real Estate

4.4%
8.6%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.2%

Utilities

1.6%
2.7%

Basic Materials

0.2%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQM
18.7%
FNX
14.4%

Industrials

FLQM
18.4%
FNX
19.3%

Financial Services

FLQM
15.4%
FNX
18.6%

Technology

FLQM
12.4%
FNX
9.5%

Healthcare

FLQM
12.2%
FNX
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLQM
7.7%
FNX
4.0%

Energy

FLQM
5.4%
FNX
6.2%

Real Estate

FLQM
4.4%
FNX
8.6%

Communication Services

FLQM
3.3%
FNX
2.2%

Utilities

FLQM
1.6%
FNX
2.7%

Basic Materials

FLQM
0.2%
FNX
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQM vs. FNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQM
FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQM vs. FNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQMFNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

1.77

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

2.59

-1.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.31

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

3.06

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.97

10.55

-7.58

FLQM vs. FNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the FNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQM and FNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQMFNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

1.77

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.41

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.42

+0.16

Drawdowns

FLQM vs. FNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQM drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum FNX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQM and FNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQMFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-57.11%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-9.24%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-24.97%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

-24.97%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-0.59%

-2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-8.41%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.68%

+0.02%

Volatility

FLQM vs. FNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) is 2.91%, while First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that FLQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQMFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

4.74%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

11.45%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.18%

16.11%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

20.50%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.48%

21.97%

-3.49%

FLQM vs. FNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FNX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQM vs. FNX - Dividend Comparison

FLQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than FNX's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.51%1.49%1.28%1.27%1.33%1.05%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.15%0.00%0.00%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.83%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQM and FNX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to FLQM (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQM dropped -37.26% vs FNX's -57.11%.

On 5-year performance, FNX leads with 8.39% vs 6.90% for FLQM. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNX has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FNX.

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.83% for FNX.

FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index, while FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLQM and 0.60% for FNX.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQM and FNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer