FLOWX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
FLOWX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 21, 2020. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
FLOWX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLOWX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOWX Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund | -0.36% | 18.02% | 8.78% | 18.58% | -19.94% | 28.52% | 35.89% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | 14.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOWX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 8.44% return.
FLOWX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -10.56%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 17.74%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLOWX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOWX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLOWX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
FLOWX
CSUIX
FLOWX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLOWX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.67 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.21 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 2.42 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 10.58 | -5.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLOWX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.67 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.64 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.58 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOWX and CSUIX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLOWX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
FLOWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOWX Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund | 2.94% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 0.42% | 0.08% | 1.41% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
FLOWX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOWX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOWX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.63% | -52.01% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -7.99% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.63% | -20.01% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.72% | -4.36% | -6.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -8.21% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 1.82% | +1.16% |
Volatility
FLOWX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that FLOWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLOWX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 3.24% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 6.90% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 11.49% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 12.86% | +4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 14.88% | +3.27% |