PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOWX vs. FDTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLOWX vs. FDTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) and Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLOWX vs. FDTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLOWX
Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund
1.85%18.02%8.78%9.08%
FDTX
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
-7.65%15.25%23.99%11.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOWX achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than FDTX's -7.65% return.


FLOWX

1D
2.22%
1M
-7.81%
YTD
1.85%
6M
3.08%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*

FDTX

1D
1.91%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
-7.65%
6M
-7.90%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLOWX vs. FDTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOWX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLOWX vs. FDTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOWX
FLOWX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FLOWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTX
FDTX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOWX vs. FDTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) and Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLOWXFDTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

0.65

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.08

+0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.14

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.01

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.69

3.15

+3.54

FLOWX vs. FDTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the FDTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOWX and FDTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLOWXFDTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

0.65

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.59

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between FLOWX and FDTX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLOWX vs. FDTX - Dividend Comparison

FLOWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than FDTX's 0.01% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FLOWX
Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund
2.88%2.93%2.51%0.42%0.08%1.41%1.49%
FDTX
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLOWX vs. FDTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, which is greater than FDTX's maximum drawdown of -27.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOWX and FDTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOWXFDTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-27.23%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-19.38%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.74%

-13.23%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-5.71%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

6.18%

-3.15%

Volatility

FLOWX vs. FDTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) is 5.86%, while Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that FLOWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLOWXFDTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

10.08%

-4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

18.74%

-9.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

28.13%

-11.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

25.23%

-7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

25.23%

-7.07%