PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOWX vs. PHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLOWX vs. PHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLOWX vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLOWX
Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund
1.85%18.02%8.78%18.58%-19.94%28.52%35.89%
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
-3.85%7.62%8.59%18.85%-14.86%31.28%41.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOWX achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -3.85% return.


FLOWX

1D
2.22%
1M
-7.81%
YTD
1.85%
6M
3.08%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*

PHO

1D
1.09%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
-6.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
8.81%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLOWX vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOWX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PHO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLOWX vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOWX
FLOWX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FLOWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOWX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PHO
PHO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHO Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOWX vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLOWXPHODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

0.27

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

0.53

+1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.06

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

0.45

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.69

1.37

+5.33

FLOWX vs. PHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the PHO Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOWX and PHO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLOWXPHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

0.27

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.37

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.35

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between FLOWX and PHO is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FLOWX vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison

FLOWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than PHO's 0.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOWX
Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund
2.88%2.93%2.51%0.42%0.08%1.41%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
0.57%0.54%0.45%0.59%0.49%0.20%0.39%0.43%0.46%0.34%0.47%0.75%

Drawdowns

FLOWX vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum PHO drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOWX and PHO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOWXPHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-55.62%

+24.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-11.98%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

-28.60%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.74%

-9.16%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-10.19%

+2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.91%

-0.88%

Volatility

FLOWX vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) at 5.37%. This indicates that FLOWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLOWXPHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

5.37%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

10.91%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

18.58%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

18.35%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

19.43%

-1.27%