FLOWX vs. PHO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FLOWX (Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both funds - FLOWX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Over the past 5 years, FLOWX returned 6.61%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for PHO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLOWX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PHO.

Performance

FLOWX vs. PHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOWX achieves a -1.28% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -1.81% return.

FLOWX

• 1D: -4.28%
• 1M: -1.64%
• 6M: -4.28%
• YTD: -1.28%
• 1Y: 2.92%
• 3Y*: 10.19%
• 5Y*: 6.61%
• 10Y*: —

PHO

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 3.32%
• 6M: -5.27%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 1Y: -2.44%
• 3Y*: 7.17%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOWX vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLOWX Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund	-1.28%	18.02%	8.78%	18.58%	-19.94%	28.52%	35.89%
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF	-1.81%	7.62%	8.59%	18.85%	-14.86%	31.28%	41.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOWX and PHO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020	0.93

The correlation between FLOWX and PHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLOWX vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOWX

FLOWX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FLOWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FLOWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FLOWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FLOWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FLOWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PHO

PHO Risk / Return Rank: 7
PHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
PHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PHO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOWX vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLOWX	PHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	-0.16	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.30	-0.12	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.99	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	-0.18	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.41	-0.41	+0.81

FLOWX vs. PHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the PHO Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOWX and PHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLOWX vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum PHO drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOWX and PHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLOWX	PHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.63%	-55.62%	+24.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.84%	-13.78%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.13%	-19.19%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.63%	-28.60%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.55%	-7.23%	-4.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-10.17%	+2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	6.01%	-0.73%

Volatility

FLOWX vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) at 4.61%. This indicates that FLOWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLOWX	PHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.69%	4.61%	+2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	11.56%	+1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.34%	15.43%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.99%	18.43%	-0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	19.45%	-1.24%

FLOWX vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOWX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PHO's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLOWX vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison

FLOWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than PHO's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLOWX Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund	1.23%	2.93%	2.51%	0.42%	0.08%	1.41%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF	0.59%	0.54%	0.45%	0.59%	0.49%	0.20%	0.39%	0.43%	0.46%	0.34%	0.47%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLOWX and PHO in my portfolio?

FLOWX and PHO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLOWX or PHO?

FLOWX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to PHO (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOWX dropped -30.63% vs PHO's -55.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLOWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.