PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOW vs. ALLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOW vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPX FLOW, Inc. (FLOW) and State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOW achieves a 17.63% return, which is significantly higher than ALLW's 6.33% return.


FLOW

1D
0.98%
1M
7.34%
6M
16.03%
YTD
17.63%
1Y
35.43%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.14%

ALLW

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.03%
6M
2.81%
YTD
6.33%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.63M$11.75M$17.60M
$147.36K$109.67K$68.22K

FLOW vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FLOW
SPX FLOW, Inc.
17.63%19.23%
ALLW
State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF
6.33%15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOW and ALLW is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOW vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLOW
FLOW Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLOW vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPX FLOW, Inc. (FLOW) and State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLOWALLWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

2.38

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

8.05

+6.65

FLOW vs. ALLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the ALLW Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOW and ALLW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLOW vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOW drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, which is greater than ALLW's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOW and ALLW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOWALLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.64%

-8.78%

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-7.23%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-3.40%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-1.42%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.13%

+0.29%

Volatility

FLOW vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison

SPX FLOW, Inc. (FLOW) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) at 2.84%. This indicates that FLOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOWALLWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

2.84%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

8.90%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

11.15%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

12.44%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

12.44%

+4.63%

Dividends

FLOW vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison

FLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than ALLW's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ALLW
State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.40%4.67%0.00%0.00%
FLOW
SPX FLOW, Inc.
1.89%2.15%2.10%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOW and ALLW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLOW has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to ALLW (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOW dropped -21.64% vs ALLW's -8.78%.

FLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOW and ALLW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer