PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOW vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLOW vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPX FLOW, Inc. (FLOW) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLOW vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLOW
SPX FLOW, Inc.
-0.74%17.52%13.03%9.38%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
9.82%36.95%-2.59%4.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOW achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 9.82% return.


FLOW

1D
1.08%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
-0.74%
6M
3.52%
1Y
17.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICOW

1D
2.29%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
9.82%
6M
18.13%
1Y
38.68%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOW vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOW
FLOW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FLOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOW vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPX FLOW, Inc. (FLOW) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLOWICOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

2.27

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

2.92

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.45

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.08

-1.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.16

14.46

-9.30

FLOW vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOW and ICOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLOWICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

2.27

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.51

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between FLOW and ICOW is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLOW vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

FLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, which matches ICOW's 2.26% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOW
SPX FLOW, Inc.
2.24%2.15%2.10%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.26%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%

Drawdowns

FLOW vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOW drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOW and ICOW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOWICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.64%

-43.49%

+21.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.12%

-12.08%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-5.12%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-7.71%

+4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

2.57%

+1.06%

Volatility

FLOW vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPX FLOW, Inc. (FLOW) is 3.66%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that FLOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLOWICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

6.21%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

10.42%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.14%

17.15%

+4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

16.58%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

18.53%

-1.34%