FLOW vs. QGRO
FLOW (SPX FLOW, Inc.) is a stock, while QGRO (American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF) is Quality Factor fund tracking the American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index. Over the past 3 years, FLOW returned 17.89%/yr vs 17.88%/yr for QGRO. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
FLOW vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLOW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 34.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.81%
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FLOW SPX FLOW, Inc. | $145.47K | $107.15K | $67.32K |
| $8.21M | $8.51M | $14.19M |
FLOW vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOW SPX FLOW, Inc. | 16.49% | 17.52% | 13.03% | 9.38% |
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.00% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 9.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOW and QGRO is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FLOW and QGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOW vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank
FLOW
QGRO
FLOW vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPX FLOW, Inc. (FLOW) and American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLOW | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.06 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.99 | 0.36 | +4.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.65 | 1.17 | +12.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLOW vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOW drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOW and QGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOW | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.64% | -32.56% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.61% | -13.54% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | -23.82% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -3.32% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -7.56% | +4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 4.13% | -1.71% |
Volatility
FLOW vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison
SPX FLOW, Inc. (FLOW) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) at 4.10%. This indicates that FLOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOW | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 4.10% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 12.90% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 16.21% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 21.20% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 22.83% | -5.75% |
Dividends
FLOW vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison
FLOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than QGRO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOW SPX FLOW, Inc. | 1.91% | 2.15% | 2.10% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOW and QGRO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLOW has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to QGRO (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOW dropped -21.64% vs QGRO's -32.56%.
FLOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLOW and QGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer