PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLNCX vs. MQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLNCX vs. MQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (FLNCX) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNCX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than MQY's 3.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLNCX having a 1.44% annualized return and MQY not far behind at 1.41%.


FLNCX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.77%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.73%
1Y
7.27%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.44%

MQY

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.13%
YTD
3.28%
6M
2.54%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
-1.93%
10Y*
1.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLNCX vs. MQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLNCX
Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund
1.26%3.49%1.05%5.32%-10.49%1.09%4.82%7.21%-0.18%4.93%
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
3.28%4.28%-0.06%10.20%-24.23%2.67%14.65%20.89%-10.12%8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FLNCX and MQY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994

0.29

Over the past year, FLNCX and MQY have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLNCX vs. MQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNCX
FLNCX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FLNCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLNCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLNCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FLNCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLNCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

MQY
MQY Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQY Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNCX vs. MQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (FLNCX) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLNCXMQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

1.09

+1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

1.82

+1.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.20

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.23

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.79

3.90

+2.88

FLNCX vs. MQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the MQY Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNCX and MQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLNCXMQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.09

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

-0.16

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.11

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.35

+0.61

Drawdowns

FLNCX vs. MQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNCX drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, smaller than the maximum MQY drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNCX and MQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNCXMQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.96%

-41.67%

+20.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-8.13%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.55%

-17.03%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.20%

-35.44%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.20%

-35.97%

+19.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-14.02%

+12.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-8.29%

+5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.56%

-1.50%

Volatility

FLNCX vs. MQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (FLNCX) is 1.17%, while BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that FLNCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLNCXMQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

3.57%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

7.27%

-5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98%

9.22%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.30%

12.18%

-7.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.35%

13.04%

-8.69%

FLNCX vs. MQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLNCX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than MQY's 2.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLNCX vs. MQY - Dividend Comparison

FLNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than MQY's 6.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLNCX
Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund
2.82%2.98%2.74%2.42%2.46%1.71%2.10%2.42%2.79%2.85%3.04%3.11%
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
6.12%6.16%6.04%4.46%5.87%4.93%4.21%4.00%5.24%5.67%6.10%6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLNCX and MQY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQY has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to FLNCX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLNCX dropped -20.96% vs MQY's -41.67%.

FLNCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLNCX and MQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer