FLNCX vs. QQQX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FLNCX (Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund) and QQQX (Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) are both mutual funds - FLNCX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Nuveen, while QQQX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, FLNCX returned 1.42%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for QQQX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FLNCX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for QQQX.

Performance

FLNCX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (FLNCX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNCX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 13.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FLNCX has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.

FLNCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: 3.02%
• 5Y*: -0.03%
• 10Y*: 1.42%

QQQX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 6M: 17.29%
• 1Y: 35.86%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 10.20%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLNCX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLNCX Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund	1.06%	3.49%	1.05%	5.32%	-10.49%	1.09%	4.82%	7.21%	-0.18%	4.93%
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	13.61%	14.87%	25.61%	21.68%	-27.39%	25.32%	15.75%	28.83%	-11.68%	39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FLNCX and QQQX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007	-0.04

The correlation between FLNCX and QQQX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLNCX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNCX

FLNCX Risk / Return Rank: 51
FLNCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FLNCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLNCX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FLNCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FLNCX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

QQQX

QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 78
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNCX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (FLNCX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLNCX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.47	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.56	-0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.46	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	4.02	-2.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.41	18.86	-12.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLNCX vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNCX and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLNCX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.47	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.52	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.65	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.49	+0.48

Drawdowns

FLNCX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNCX drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNCX and QQQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLNCX	QQQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.96%	-57.25%	+36.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.43%	-9.11%	+5.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.55%	-22.80%	+16.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.20%	-29.33%	+13.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.20%	-35.96%	+19.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-0.19%	-1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-8.02%	+5.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	1.94%	-0.88%

Volatility

FLNCX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund (FLNCX) is 1.16%, while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that FLNCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLNCX	QQQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	3.90%	-2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.27%	11.47%	-9.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.98%	14.60%	-11.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.30%	19.81%	-15.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.35%	21.06%	-16.71%

FLNCX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLNCX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLNCX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

FLNCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than QQQX's 7.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLNCX Nuveen North Carolina Municipal Bond Fund	2.83%	2.98%	2.74%	2.42%	2.46%	1.71%	2.10%	2.42%	2.79%	2.85%	3.04%	3.11%
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	7.24%	7.85%	6.73%	7.26%	9.66%	5.85%	6.00%	6.49%	8.40%	5.95%	7.54%	7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLNCX and QQQX in my portfolio?

FLNCX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLNCX or QQQX?

QQQX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to FLNCX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLNCX dropped -20.96% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.