PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQY vs. MFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQY vs. MFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) and MFS Municipal Income Trust (MFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQY achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly higher than MFM's 1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, MQY has underperformed MFM with an annualized return of 1.46%, while MFM has yielded a comparatively higher 1.60% annualized return.


MQY

1D
0.26%
1M
1.85%
YTD
3.73%
6M
3.80%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
6.24%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*
1.46%

MFM

1D
0.19%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.66%
6M
4.03%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
-1.09%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQY vs. MFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
3.73%4.28%-0.06%10.20%-24.23%2.67%14.65%20.89%-10.12%8.98%
MFM
MFS Municipal Income Trust
1.66%6.95%8.35%4.11%-22.63%9.45%-0.87%20.83%-5.56%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MQY and MFM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994

0.30

Over the past year, MQY and MFM have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQY vs. MFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQY
MQY Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MFM
MFM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQY vs. MFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) and MFS Municipal Income Trust (MFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MQYMFMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.14

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

1.81

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.82

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.01

5.94

-1.92

MQY vs. MFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQY Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the MFM Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQY and MFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MQYMFMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.14

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

-0.08

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.11

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.21

+0.15

Drawdowns

MQY vs. MFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQY drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, smaller than the maximum MFM drawdown of -54.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQY and MFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQYMFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.67%

-54.24%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-6.21%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.03%

-17.01%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-34.39%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-34.39%

-1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

-8.52%

-5.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-8.95%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.91%

+0.64%

Volatility

MQY vs. MFM - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to MFS Municipal Income Trust (MFM) at 2.82%. This indicates that MQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQYMFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

2.82%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

8.10%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

10.63%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

14.15%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.04%

14.72%

-1.68%

Dividends

MQY vs. MFM - Dividend Comparison

MQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than MFM's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFM
MFS Municipal Income Trust
5.33%5.08%4.65%4.12%4.85%4.34%4.70%4.71%5.91%5.61%5.72%5.76%
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
6.09%6.16%6.04%4.46%5.87%4.93%4.21%4.00%5.24%5.67%6.10%6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQY and MFM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQY has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to MFM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQY dropped -41.67% vs MFM's -54.24%.

MFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQY and MFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer