PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQY vs. COTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQY vs. COTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) and Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado (COTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQY achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly higher than COTFX's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MQY has outperformed COTFX with an annualized return of 1.46%, while COTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.22% annualized return.


MQY

1D
0.26%
1M
1.85%
YTD
3.73%
6M
3.80%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
6.24%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*
1.46%

COTFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.60%
6M
2.10%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
2.88%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
1.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQY vs. COTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
3.73%4.28%-0.06%10.20%-24.23%2.67%14.65%20.89%-10.12%8.98%
COTFX
Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado
1.60%3.71%0.38%3.61%-6.53%-0.55%3.80%5.19%0.66%2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MQY and COTFX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.27

Over the past year, MQY and COTFX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQY vs. COTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQY
MQY Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

COTFX
COTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
COTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
COTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
COTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
COTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQY vs. COTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) and Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado (COTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MQYCOTFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

2.76

-1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

4.43

-2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.71

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

2.40

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.01

8.34

-4.33

MQY vs. COTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQY Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the COTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQY and COTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MQYCOTFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.76

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.16

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.41

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.22

-0.87

Drawdowns

MQY vs. COTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQY drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, which is greater than COTFX's maximum drawdown of -10.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQY and COTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQYCOTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.67%

-10.44%

-31.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-2.83%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.03%

-4.55%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-10.36%

-25.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-10.44%

-25.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

-0.68%

-12.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-1.52%

-6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

0.81%

+1.74%

Volatility

MQY vs. COTFX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado (COTFX) at 0.89%. This indicates that MQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQYCOTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

0.89%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

1.88%

+5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

2.41%

+6.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

2.91%

+9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.04%

3.00%

+10.04%

MQY vs. COTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQY has a 2.07% expense ratio, which is higher than COTFX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQY vs. COTFX - Dividend Comparison

MQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than COTFX's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COTFX
Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado
3.32%3.28%2.42%1.99%1.32%1.42%1.75%2.46%2.38%2.52%2.68%2.94%
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
6.09%6.16%6.04%4.46%5.87%4.93%4.21%4.00%5.24%5.67%6.10%6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQY and COTFX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQY has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to COTFX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQY dropped -41.67% vs COTFX's -10.44%.

COTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQY and COTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer