PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLN vs. FLBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLN vs. FLBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly lower than FLBR's 15.12% return.


FLN

1D
-2.00%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
11.67%
6M
11.54%
1Y
36.27%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
9.85%

FLBR

1D
-3.35%
1M
-10.42%
YTD
15.12%
6M
10.76%
1Y
35.11%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLN vs. FLBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLN
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund
11.67%55.05%-23.10%29.68%2.73%-6.94%-12.27%27.22%-8.31%2.10%
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
15.12%45.57%-27.58%33.19%10.44%-16.78%-20.13%28.47%-2.13%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FLN and FLBR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.82

The correlation between FLN and FLBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLN vs. FLBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLN
FLBR

Financial Services

23.4%
28.0%

Utilities

16.9%
14.7%

Industrials

12.4%
7.8%

Basic Materials

12.0%
15.9%

Energy

10.2%
19.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
4.5%

Communication Services

7.1%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

4.7%
0.8%

Technology

2.1%
0.7%

Healthcare

0.6%
2.7%

Financial Services

FLN
23.4%
FLBR
28.0%

Utilities

FLN
16.9%
FLBR
14.7%

Industrials

FLN
12.4%
FLBR
7.8%

Basic Materials

FLN
12.0%
FLBR
15.9%

Energy

FLN
10.2%
FLBR
19.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLN
7.2%
FLBR
4.5%

Communication Services

FLN
7.1%
FLBR
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FLN
5.4%
FLBR
2.4%

Real Estate

FLN
4.7%
FLBR
0.8%

Technology

FLN
2.1%
FLBR
0.7%

Healthcare

FLN
0.6%
FLBR
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLN vs. FLBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLN
FLN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FLBR
FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLN vs. FLBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLNFLBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.41

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

1.93

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.23

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.06

6.93

+2.13

FLN vs. FLBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FLBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLN and FLBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLNFLBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.41

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.20

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.15

-0.07

Drawdowns

FLN vs. FLBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FLBR drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and FLBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNFLBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.95%

-57.42%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-15.85%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-28.97%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.95%

-32.74%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-15.85%

+5.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-18.62%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

5.08%

-1.07%

Volatility

FLN vs. FLBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) is 6.41%, while Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that FLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLNFLBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

8.12%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.20%

21.22%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.96%

25.09%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

27.69%

-5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.64%

33.08%

-5.44%

FLN vs. FLBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLBR's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLN vs. FLBR - Dividend Comparison

FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than FLBR's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
6.69%7.71%7.68%8.84%11.99%8.71%2.32%3.42%3.72%0.42%0.00%0.00%
FLN
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund
3.59%3.40%6.26%4.17%5.57%4.70%1.64%1.91%3.08%10.28%1.06%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLN and FLBR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLBR has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to FLN (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLN dropped -57.95% vs FLBR's -57.42%.

On 5-year performance, FLN leads with 8.98% vs 5.54% for FLBR. On fees, FLBR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLN has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLN has performed better with a 8.98% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLBR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FLN.

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 3.59% for FLN.

FLN tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FLN and 0.19% for FLBR.

FLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLN and FLBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer