PortfoliosLab logo
FLN vs. BRF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLN and BRF is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FLN vs. BRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLN:

0.08

BRF:

0.07

Sortino Ratio

FLN:

0.19

BRF:

0.21

Omega Ratio

FLN:

1.02

BRF:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

FLN:

0.02

BRF:

0.00

Martin Ratio

FLN:

0.06

BRF:

0.01

Ulcer Index

FLN:

9.22%

BRF:

13.63%

Daily Std Dev

FLN:

22.38%

BRF:

29.48%

Max Drawdown

FLN:

-57.93%

BRF:

-81.72%

Current Drawdown

FLN:

-5.36%

BRF:

-57.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 25.23% return, which is significantly lower than BRF's 31.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FLN has outperformed BRF with an annualized return of 4.59%, while BRF has yielded a comparatively lower 2.03% annualized return.


FLN

YTD

25.23%

1M

0.53%

6M

16.99%

1Y

1.72%

3Y*

2.65%

5Y*

10.82%

10Y*

4.59%

BRF

YTD

31.27%

1M

5.36%

6M

19.49%

1Y

2.11%

3Y*

-2.93%

5Y*

2.60%

10Y*

2.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLN vs. BRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BRF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLN vs. BRF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLN is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLN is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLN is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLN is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLN is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLN is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BRF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BRF is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BRF is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BRF is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BRF is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BRF is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BRF is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLN vs. BRF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLN Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is comparable to the BRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLN and BRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FLN vs. BRF - Dividend Comparison

FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than BRF's 3.10% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLN
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund
4.59%6.26%4.17%5.57%4.70%1.63%1.91%3.08%10.27%1.06%2.34%3.96%
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
3.10%4.07%5.01%4.13%2.97%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%4.23%

Drawdowns

FLN vs. BRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, smaller than the maximum BRF drawdown of -81.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and BRF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FLN vs. BRF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) is 4.93%, while VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that FLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...