FLN vs. VOO
FLN (First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLN is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLN returned 9.52%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
FLN vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FLN has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.52%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
FLN
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 34.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
FLN vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund | 11.71% | 55.05% | -23.10% | 29.68% | 2.73% | -6.94% | -12.27% | 27.22% | -8.31% | 21.54% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLN and VOO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011 | 0.43 |
The correlation between FLN and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLN vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLN
VOO
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
FLN
VOO
Utilities
FLN
VOO
Basic Materials
FLN
VOO
Industrials
FLN
VOO
Energy
FLN
VOO
Consumer Defensive
FLN
VOO
Communication Services
FLN
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
FLN
VOO
Real Estate
FLN
VOO
Technology
FLN
VOO
Healthcare
FLN
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLN vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FLN
VOO
FLN vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLN | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 3.02 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.43 | 13.58 | -6.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLN vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLN | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.95% | -33.99% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -8.90% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -18.69% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.95% | -24.52% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.75% | -33.99% | -23.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.96% | -1.74% | -8.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.87% | -3.68% | -15.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 1.98% | +2.65% |
Volatility
FLN vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that FLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLN | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 4.60% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 9.73% | +8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 12.39% | +8.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 16.90% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.57% | 18.05% | +9.52% |
FLN vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLN vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund | 3.59% | 3.40% | 6.26% | 4.17% | 5.57% | 4.70% | 1.64% | 1.91% | 3.08% | 10.28% | 1.06% | 2.34% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLN and VOO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLN has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLN dropped -57.95% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 9.52% for FLN. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FLN.
FLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.
FLN is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FLN tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FLN and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLN and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer