PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLN vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLN vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FLN has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.52%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


FLN

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
11.71%
6M
14.85%
1Y
34.33%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
9.52%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLN vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLN
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund
11.71%55.05%-23.10%29.68%2.73%-6.94%-12.27%27.22%-8.31%21.54%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FLN and VOO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.43

The correlation between FLN and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLN vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLN
VOO

Financial Services

23.6%
10.9%

Utilities

16.2%
2.5%

Basic Materials

12.9%
1.7%

Industrials

12.5%
7.6%

Energy

9.4%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
4.5%

Communication Services

6.6%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
9.8%

Real Estate

5.1%
1.8%

Technology

2.1%
39.1%

Healthcare

0.6%
8.3%

Financial Services

FLN
23.6%
VOO
10.9%

Utilities

FLN
16.2%
VOO
2.5%

Basic Materials

FLN
12.9%
VOO
1.7%

Industrials

FLN
12.5%
VOO
7.6%

Energy

FLN
9.4%
VOO
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLN
7.8%
VOO
4.5%

Communication Services

FLN
6.6%
VOO
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FLN
5.4%
VOO
9.8%

Real Estate

FLN
5.1%
VOO
1.8%

Technology

FLN
2.1%
VOO
39.1%

Healthcare

FLN
0.6%
VOO
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLN vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLN
FLN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLN vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLNVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.02

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.43

13.58

-6.15

FLN vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLN and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLN vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.95%

-33.99%

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-8.90%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-18.69%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.95%

-24.52%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.75%

-33.99%

-23.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.96%

-1.74%

-8.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-3.68%

-15.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

1.98%

+2.65%

Volatility

FLN vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that FLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLNVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

4.60%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

9.73%

+8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

12.39%

+8.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.65%

16.90%

+5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.57%

18.05%

+9.52%

FLN vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLN vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLN
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund
3.59%3.40%6.26%4.17%5.57%4.70%1.64%1.91%3.08%10.28%1.06%2.34%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLN and VOO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLN has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLN dropped -57.95% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.77% vs 9.52% for FLN. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FLN.

FLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.

FLN is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FLN tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FLN and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLN and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer