FLMX vs. FLCH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLMX (Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLMX is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLMX returned 12.84%/yr vs -2.36%/yr for FLCH. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

FLMX vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMX achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -6.24% return.

FLMX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 1.31%
• 6M: 2.45%
• YTD: 12.37%
• 1Y: 33.02%
• 3Y*: 10.51%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.99%

FLCH

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 8.56%
• 6M: -8.62%
• YTD: -6.24%
• 1Y: 1.51%
• 3Y*: 8.42%
• 5Y*: -2.36%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	$3.65M	$4.23M	$3.21M
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF	$237.66K	$216.97K	$406.60K

FLMX vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF	12.37%	53.62%	-28.45%	39.35%	2.40%	19.58%	-3.50%	12.13%	-13.32%	-0.96%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-6.24%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMX and FLCH is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.40

FLMX vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLMX	FLCH
Consumer Defensive	29.5%	3.5%
Financial Services	20.3%	19.5%
Basic Materials	18.8%	5.4%
Industrials	14.2%	8.0%
Communication Services	8.4%	16.8%
Real Estate	7.4%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	23.3%
Energy	-	3.4%
Healthcare	-	5.9%
Technology	-	9.9%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

FLMX vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLMX

FLMX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 12
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLMX vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLMX	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.08	+1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	0.25	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.03	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	0.07	+2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.46	0.15	+7.31

FLMX vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMX and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLMX vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMX and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLMX	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.05%	-62.09%	+12.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.18%	-21.48%	+7.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.72%	-25.15%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.72%	-50.38%	+18.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.48%	-33.91%	+29.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.92%	-30.63%	+18.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	10.27%	-5.83%

Volatility

FLMX vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) is 5.20%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that FLMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLMX	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	5.71%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.93%	13.84%	+4.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.81%	19.87%	+1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.07%	29.34%	-7.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.60%	27.77%	-3.17%

FLMX vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLMX and FLCH have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLMX vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

FLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than FLCH's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.31%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF	3.81%	3.99%	3.31%	2.90%	4.22%	3.15%	1.48%	2.95%	2.51%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLMX and FLCH in my portfolio?

FLMX and FLCH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLMX or FLCH?

FLCH has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to FLMX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMX dropped -50.05% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which ETF is better, FLMX or FLCH?

On 5-year performance, FLMX leads with 12.84% vs -2.36% for FLCH. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, FLMX has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLMX or FLCH?

Over the 5-year period, FLMX has performed better with a 12.84% return vs -2.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLMX or FLCH?

FLMX and FLCH have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLMX or FLCH?

FLMX has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.31% for FLCH.

What is the main difference between FLMX and FLCH?

FLMX is categorized as Latin America Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.