FLMB vs. THYM
FLMB (Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF) and THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLMB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for THYM.
Performance
FLMB vs. THYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLMB achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than THYM's 3.33% return.
FLMB
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
THYM
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLMB vs. THYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLMB Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF | 1.89% | 0.28% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.33% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLMB and THYM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLMB vs. THYM — Risk / Return Rank
FLMB
THYM
FLMB vs. THYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLMB | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLMB | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.62 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
FLMB vs. THYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLMB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, which is greater than THYM's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMB and THYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLMB | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -2.93% | -14.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | 0.00% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -0.49% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility
FLMB vs. THYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLMB | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 4.35% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 4.35% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 4.35% | +1.23% |
FLMB vs. THYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than THYM's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLMB vs. THYM - Dividend Comparison
FLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than THYM's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMB Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF | 3.75% | 3.86% | 3.79% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 1.66% | 2.07% | 2.40% | 2.68% | 0.54% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.18% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLMB and THYM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLMB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLMB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.
FLMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 2.18% for THYM.
FLMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while THYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLMB and 0.32% for THYM.
Find the right allocation for FLMB and THYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer