FLMB vs. NCLO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLMB (Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF) and NCLO (Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while NCLO is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLO A Index. FLMB is actively managed, while NCLO is passively managed. Over the past year, FLMB returned 6.42% vs 5.95% for NCLO. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLMB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NCLO.

Performance

FLMB vs. NCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMB achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than NCLO's 3.07% return.

FLMB

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -2.06%
• 6M: -0.05%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 1Y: 6.42%
• 3Y*: 3.83%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.13%

NCLO

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.69%
• 6M: 2.53%
• YTD: 3.07%
• 1Y: 5.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLMB Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF	$236.78K	$198.32K	$268.48K
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	$1.42M	$964.97K	$1.08M

FLMB vs. NCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLMB Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF	0.50%	3.93%	-1.86%
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	3.07%	6.28%	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMB and NCLO is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	0.02

Return for Risk

FLMB vs. NCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLMB

FLMB Risk / Return Rank: 68
FLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 54

NCLO

NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 67
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLMB vs. NCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLMB	NCLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.51	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.96	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.41	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	1.96	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	11.50	-4.73

FLMB vs. NCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the NCLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMB and NCLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLMB vs. NCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMB drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, which is greater than NCLO's maximum drawdown of -3.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMB and NCLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLMB	NCLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.90%	-3.05%	-14.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-3.05%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-0.19%	-1.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.10%	-0.23%	-3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.52%	+0.43%

Volatility

FLMB vs. NCLO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF (FLMB) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) at 0.71%. This indicates that FLMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLMB	NCLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	0.71%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	3.78%	-1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.49%	3.96%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.13%	3.76%	+1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.54%	3.76%	+1.78%

FLMB vs. NCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NCLO's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLMB vs. NCLO - Dividend Comparison

FLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than NCLO's 5.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLMB Franklin Liberty Federal Tax-Free Bond ETF	4.13%	3.86%	3.79%	3.49%	2.80%	1.66%	2.07%	2.40%	2.68%	0.54%
NCLO Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF	5.74%	6.09%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLMB and NCLO in my portfolio?

FLMB and NCLO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLMB or NCLO?

FLMB has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to NCLO (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMB dropped -17.90% vs NCLO's -3.05%.

Which ETF is better, FLMB or NCLO?

On 1-year performance, FLMB leads with 6.42% vs 5.95% for NCLO. On fees, NCLO is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NCLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLMB or NCLO?

Over the 1-year period, FLMB has performed better with a 6.42% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLMB or NCLO?

NCLO is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLMB or NCLO?

NCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 4.13% for FLMB.

What is the main difference between FLMB and NCLO?

FLMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while NCLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLMB and 0.26% for NCLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.