FLLA vs. BIL
FLLA (Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLLA is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLLA returned 7.74%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FLLA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
FLLA vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a 12.04% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.66% return.
FLLA
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 6M
- 14.05%
- 1Y
- 33.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
FLLA vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 12.04% | 51.81% | -26.89% | 32.71% | 7.78% | -8.93% | -15.08% | 19.59% | -2.78% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.66% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLLA and BIL is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018 | -0.01 |
The correlation between FLLA and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLLA vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
FLLA
BIL
FLLA vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLLA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -171.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 87.41 | -86.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 353.28 | -350.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 2,801.35 | -2,794.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLLA vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLLA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.88% | -0.78% | -53.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -0.01% | -13.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.76% | -0.01% | -27.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -0.09% | -28.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.42% | 0.00% | -11.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -0.26% | -13.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 0.00% | +4.78% |
Volatility
FLLA vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that FLLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLLA | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 0.07% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 0.14% | +17.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.73% | 0.20% | +21.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 0.26% | +22.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.49% | 0.26% | +27.23% |
FLLA vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLLA vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 3.46% | 6.06% | 7.04% | 5.45% | 9.55% | 7.60% | 2.12% | 3.18% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLLA and BIL have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLLA has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLA dropped -53.88% vs BIL's -0.78%.
On 5-year performance, FLLA leads with 7.74% vs 3.45% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLLA has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLLA.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.46% for FLLA.
FLLA is categorized as Latin America Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. FLLA tracks FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLLA and 0.14% for BIL.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.37 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLLA and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer